TradeMark Management

TradeMark Management

18 Ocak 2010 Pazartesi

Trademark Management

Trademark Management
Trademark audits – what you need to know..

One of the most important services that should be performed by trademark professionals, which is often overlooked, is a trademark audit. Trademarks are not static. Thus, it is imperative that a company’s trademark assets are reviewed regularly.

A trademark audit allows a company to review, manage and fully exploit the value
of existing and potential trademarks. A trademark audit can range from a yearly
review managed internally, to a comprehensive audit conducted by outside
counsel. Trademark audits are also often conducted as part of a comprehensive due
diligence programme by an acquiring company, the results of which can often
make or break a deal.

The benefits of a trademark audit include the identification of new brands and the
maximum exploitation of existing brands. Thus, a bare bones trademark audit includes a survey of what marks are currently used by a company (as well as whether proper trademark use and notice is being made), what applications and registrations exist, and a review of the chain of title. Through this analysis, a trademark audit will identify trademark assets that have not been protected. While companies are usually aware of their core brands, a review of, among other things, product lines, marketing materials and websites will often reveal trademarks that have not been identified, including in many cases, nontraditional marks. In addition, a company may have expanded use of its marks into product lines or geographic markets that were not initially contemplated at the time of filing, or, in some cases, the initial filing may simply not have been broad enough A cost-benefit analysis (taking into account the longevity of a product line/new geographic market) should follow to evaluate whether new applications should be filed to cover the expanded breadth of the goods/services/countries where a mark is used. This ensures that a company is obtaining proper protection to exploit and enforce its marks in connection with all of the goods/services and geographic regions of represents a cost-effective filing strategy to fill the geographic gaps in protection.
In addition, one of the best reasons to perform a trademark audit is that it may
identify opportunities to increase revenue through exploitation of existing or newly
identified brands. A primary path to increasing revenues (other than direct sales
under a mark) comes from licensingarrangements. As with acquiring companies,
of key concern to a licensee will be the value of the brand, including whether or not it has been protected. Regular trademark audits demonstrate a commitment to the value of those assets and will usually result in a positive review by a potential licensee.
A trademark audit can also identify critical ownership issues. If an application is
filed in the name of a party which did not own the rights to the mark at the time the
application was filed, any resulting registration may be void, in which case a
new filing should be considered. Further, a mark may have been assigned to another
entity, or a name change or merger may have occurred since filing. Ensuring that the
chain of title is clean is imperative. Filing suit or an opposition without proper
ownership may create a standing issue, resulting in zero value in a trademark
registration. Similarly, a review of liens and security interests tied to trademark assets
should be reviewed to determine if such encumbrances should be removed.
Further, as the audit is conducted, attention should be paid to whether proper
trademark use and trademark notice is being practised by the company. Proper
trademark use and notice can deter third parties from adopting a mark similar to
your client’s or company’s mark and, in some cases, can ensure that a mark does not
become generic.
A company must also have a programme in place to monitor effectively
potential infringements and enforce its trademarks. Failure to do so can weaken or
even completely destroy the value of a brand. Thus, an audit of policing activities
and monitoring programmes should be conducted. For example, watching services
in place for marks in which the company. has lost interest should be cancelled,

whereas they should be added for Marks that are important to the company and not
currently being watched. The scope of the watching services (in terms of classes and
types of service) should also be carefully reviewed to ensure that all third-party marks of interest will be revealed. A review of any settlement agreements with potential infringers should also be reviewed to assess the contractual obligations of third parties and to ensure that they are complying with the terms of such agreements (including limitations as to registration/use). Allowance of noncompliance
with settlement terms can result in a waiver of rights. Further, an area that is often overlooked is appropriate customs recordation for registered marks.
This can be an important tool in stopping the import (and in some countries the
export) of counterfeit or infringing goods. Domain name acquisition can also play
a vital role in the protection of a company’s trademarks. Thus, an audit of a company’s domain name portfolio should be conducted in conjunction with the
trademark audit. Domain name acquisition is an inexpensive means to keep others
from adopting marks or trade names identical to that of your client or company.
When trademark audits are not regularly performed, certain events (such as
a desire to enforce, sell or continue to use certain marks) typically highlight
deficiencies in a trademark programme.
However, in many cases, it is too late to cure the deficiencies. Consequently, valuable trademark rights can be lost/weakened or a company may not be able to exploit its trademarks fully in connection with certain goods/services/countries of interest. Regular trademark audits will help optimize the business benefits that a company derives from its valuable trademark rights and ensure that the integrity of a company’s trademarks is maintained.

Susan M Natland is a partner in Knobbe Martens Olsen & Bear LLP's Orange County
office. She handles the development and management of worldwide trademark
portfolios, and specializes in all aspects of domestic and international trademark
selection, protection, licensing and enforcement.
snatland@kmob.com

Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder